DR. JOHN ON FOX NATIONAL TV WITH JOHN GISON
icon1 admin | icon2 News & Events | icon4 01 30th, 2007| icon3Comments Off

FOX TV – Jan 30, 2007 – Parent and Coach Fistfight at Youth Hockey Game – This is a partial transcript of “The Big Story With John Gibson,” January 30, 2007, that has been edited for clarity.

JOHN GIBSON, HOST: Our “Big Sports Story” is the big fistfight that broke out over the weekend at a children’s hockey game in Connecticut.

The brawl began when the father of a player from the visiting team lost his temper and started screaming and cursing at the kids from the opposing side. The referee kicked him out of the arena but it didn’t end there. After the game, the coach of the Connecticut Wolves tracked that father down, chewed him out and then beat him down.

Here is how one eyewitness described what happened inside the arena and the beatdown afterwards:

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

MATTHEW O’BUCK, PARENT WHO WITNESSED FIGHT: He swore at the kids and said vulgarities to the kids, throwing the F-bomb out at them and calling them F-ing little Ps and this and that. And it was just unacceptable behavior.

He shoved Frank Rockwell high around the neck, enough to cock his neck back and he lost his balance when he came into me. I got a bruise on my bicep from it.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

GIBSON: The scene in North Branford, Connecticut, was a bloody mess. The angry coach and the loudmouth parent are both facing assault charges. And now all you parents watching this at home, heads up. You could get your clock cleaned just going to your kids next game.

With me now is criminal defense attorney Joe Tacopina and sports psychologist Dr. John Murray.

So Joe, if I can go to you first, these guys that are charged, you are a criminal attorney. How much hot water are they in?

JOE TACOPINA, CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEY: Obviously, they are in and out of hot water to be arrested and be put into the system with something that should have been nothing more than an argument, John. There is not going to be a lot of sympathy that either of these two parents are going to receive from either prosecutor or potential jury.

I mean, look, it is bad enough that they have committed the crime of assault, which basically means the striking of another with the intent to cause injury and causing that injury. It’s misdemeanor assault, as I understand it. But what is worse is that they had subjected all of these kids. And quite frankly, a creative prosecutor could throw in charges like endangering the welfare of a child and stuff like that. But just really these are two ogres, unfortunately, who are going to face the weight of the law.

GIBSON: Dr. Murray, let me put this up on the screen: Peewee Hockey Rage: Loudmouth Parent vs. Hothead Coach. We see more of this than we’d like to see. And I think people now have to worry about what happens if I go to a kids’ game. Am I going to end up in the middle of a brawl? Do you see much of this?

DR. JOHN MURRAY, SPORTS PSYCHOLOGIST: I don’t see much in my office because these parents are probably avoiding me. But I think we need to do a whole lot more in our society. This is absolutely absurd to have these fights break out. And I think the parents need to realize that kids have to have a life.

GIBSON: Let me put a quote up on here. The first is of the league talking about the coach. The coach is charged. He beat up the parent. And the league said it was a very uncharacteristic thing of this particular coach and, nonetheless, the Connecticut Wolves hockey team has suspended the coach from further participation pending investigation.

Then the coach said in his own defense that he was just going out to chew out the parent who made all the trouble. “No child should be berated with expletives or physically intimidated by an adult. When encountered outside the rink and questioned about his behavior, he,” this is the coach talking about the parent, “chose to escalate the situation by physically assaulting me.”

GIBSON: Joe, this guy is being held responsible by the league. His defense is that if he does want to yell at the parent you shouldn’t have done this and the guy jumped in. Has he got a defense in here you can see that makes sense?

TACOPINA: What we just heard that one witness say may bring to the coach the affirmative defense of self-defense. Unfortunately, in a case like this, even though if you believe this witness, the coach was struck first. And look, he had every right to go and berate this guy and tell him what he thought he did.

Maybe it wasn’t a great thing to do. Obviously a parent who yells those sorts of things at children has some, I think, mental imbalance that he might want to do a confrontation on but being that he did, once he was struck, there is a theory that he had a right to defend himself, although the law does impose a duty to retreat. So what he should have done is leave and call the police.

GIBSON: Dr. Murray, there are plenty of women, moms, who take their kids to games: soccer games, baseball games, Pop Warner football, peewee hockey like this. How come we never hear about women getting into these kind of altercations?

MURRAY: We are hearing more about it now. I got a call yesterday about women in fault in a basketball game that got into a violent fight. Now that’s not quite the same issue but we are seeing more and more of this all the time. And I don’t know really why. One of the main things we have to do is realize that the kids are not going to become professional athletes. So we’re putting a lot of energy in an area that’s not necessary. A very small percentage become professional. So why are we doing this to our kids?

GIBSON: Dr. John Murray and, of course, our criminal defense attorney, Joe Tacopina. Thanks to both of you. And parents, heads up, when you go to that little kid’s game, there could be trouble.

Dr. John F. Murray is a sports psychologist and clinical psychologist providing sports psychology and counseling services based in Palm Beach, Florida.

DR. JOHN ON FOX NATIONAL TV WITH JOHN GIBSON
icon1 admin | icon2 News & Events | icon4 01 30th, 2007| icon3Comments Off

FOX TV – Jan 30, 2007 – Parent and Coach Fistfight at Youth Hockey Game – This is a partial transcript of “The Big Story With John Gibson,” January 30, 2007, that has been edited for clarity.

JOHN GIBSON, HOST: Our “Big Sports Story” is the big fistfight that broke out over the weekend at a children’s hockey game in Connecticut.

The brawl began when the father of a player from the visiting team lost his temper and started screaming and cursing at the kids from the opposing side. The referee kicked him out of the arena but it didn’t end there. After the game, the coach of the Connecticut Wolves tracked that father down, chewed him out and then beat him down.

Here is how one eyewitness described what happened inside the arena and the beatdown afterwards:

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

MATTHEW O’BUCK, PARENT WHO WITNESSED FIGHT: He swore at the kids and said vulgarities to the kids, throwing the F-bomb out at them and calling them F-ing little Ps and this and that. And it was just unacceptable behavior.

He shoved Frank Rockwell high around the neck, enough to cock his neck back and he lost his balance when he came into me. I got a bruise on my bicep from it.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

GIBSON: The scene in North Branford, Connecticut, was a bloody mess. The angry coach and the loudmouth parent are both facing assault charges. And now all you parents watching this at home, heads up. You could get your clock cleaned just going to your kids next game.

With me now is criminal defense attorney Joe Tacopina and sports psychologist Dr. John Murray.

So Joe, if I can go to you first, these guys that are charged, you are a criminal attorney. How much hot water are they in?

JOE TACOPINA, CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEY: Obviously, they are in and out of hot water to be arrested and be put into the system with something that should have been nothing more than an argument, John. There is not going to be a lot of sympathy that either of these two parents are going to receive from either prosecutor or potential jury.

I mean, look, it is bad enough that they have committed the crime of assault, which basically means the striking of another with the intent to cause injury and causing that injury. It’s misdemeanor assault, as I understand it. But what is worse is that they had subjected all of these kids. And quite frankly, a creative prosecutor could throw in charges like endangering the welfare of a child and stuff like that. But just really these are two ogres, unfortunately, who are going to face the weight of the law.

GIBSON: Dr. Murray, let me put this up on the screen: Peewee Hockey Rage: Loudmouth Parent vs. Hothead Coach. We see more of this than we’d like to see. And I think people now have to worry about what happens if I go to a kids’ game. Am I going to end up in the middle of a brawl? Do you see much of this?

DR. JOHN MURRAY, SPORTS PSYCHOLOGIST: I don’t see much in my office because these parents are probably avoiding me. But I think we need to do a whole lot more in our society. This is absolutely absurd to have these fights break out. And I think the parents need to realize that kids have to have a life.

GIBSON: Let me put a quote up on here. The first is of the league talking about the coach. The coach is charged. He beat up the parent. And the league said it was a very uncharacteristic thing of this particular coach and, nonetheless, the Connecticut Wolves hockey team has suspended the coach from further participation pending investigation.

Then the coach said in his own defense that he was just going out to chew out the parent who made all the trouble. “No child should be berated with expletives or physically intimidated by an adult. When encountered outside the rink and questioned about his behavior, he,” this is the coach talking about the parent, “chose to escalate the situation by physically assaulting me.”

GIBSON: Joe, this guy is being held responsible by the league. His defense is that if he does want to yell at the parent you shouldn’t have done this and the guy jumped in. Has he got a defense in here you can see that makes sense?

TACOPINA: What we just heard that one witness say may bring to the coach the affirmative defense of self-defense. Unfortunately, in a case like this, even though if you believe this witness, the coach was struck first. And look, he had every right to go and berate this guy and tell him what he thought he did.

Maybe it wasn’t a great thing to do. Obviously a parent who yells those sorts of things at children has some, I think, mental imbalance that he might want to do a confrontation on but being that he did, once he was struck, there is a theory that he had a right to defend himself, although the law does impose a duty to retreat. So what he should have done is leave and call the police.

GIBSON: Dr. Murray, there are plenty of women, moms, who take their kids to games: soccer games, baseball games, Pop Warner football, peewee hockey like this. How come we never hear about women getting into these kind of altercations?

MURRAY: We are hearing more about it now. I got a call yesterday about women in fault in a basketball game that got into a violent fight. Now that’s not quite the same issue but we are seeing more and more of this all the time. And I don’t know really why. One of the main things we have to do is realize that the kids are not going to become professional athletes. So we’re putting a lot of energy in an area that’s not necessary. A very small percentage become professional. So why are we doing this to our kids?

GIBSON: Dr. John Murray and, of course, our criminal defense attorney, Joe Tacopina. Thanks to both of you. And parents, heads up, when you go to that little kid’s game, there could be trouble.

Dr. John F. Murray is a sports psychologist and clinical psychologist providing sports psychology and counseling services based in Palm Beach, Florida.

DEALING WITH PRE-SUPER BOWL STRESS
icon1 admin | icon2 News & Events | icon4 01 29th, 2007| icon3Comments Off

Miami Herald and San Jose Mercury News – Jan 29, 2007 – Barry Jackson – Super anxiety: Players cope as best they can before the big game – MIAMI – When the Chicago Bears and Indianapolis Colts step on the Dolphin Stadium field next Sunday, they can expect to be swept up in a whirlwind of emotions, a combustible cocktail of anxiety and anticipation unlike anything most athletes ever experience.

And they will exit Super Bowl XLI with memories that will endure forever, ones that, years later, will instantly elicit either a smile or a grimace, ones that will be broached by strangers in supermarket aisles and restaurants long after the players have hung up their jerseys.

So what’s it like preparing for a Super Bowl or college football championship game, playing in it and dealing with the consequences? Those who have lived it say nothing in life compares.

“You can’t even explain it,” said former University of Miami running back Melvin Bratton, who played in two college games with a national title at stake (winning one) and started in a Super Bowl loss as a member of the Denver Broncos. “Your whole body is numb. You hear no crowd noise. You can hear yourself breathe. That’s how intense the feeling is. It’s a natural high.”

Former All-Pro quarterback Joe Theismann, who played in two Super Bowls, took “100 trips to the bathroom” in the 10 minutes before taking the field. “Guys get sick,” he said.

“I saw teammates hyperventilating, throwing up, linebackers banging their heads against the locker-room wall.”

Theismann calmed himself before his Super Bowl appearances by following his normal ritual of eating a banana split the night before the game and reading People magazine shortly before kickoff.

The night before his first Super Bowl, a January 1983 win against the Dolphins, he soothed his psyche by spending 90 minutes on the phone talking to his buddy, actor Burt Reynolds, about football and life.

Still, he managed only three hours’ sleep. The key, Theismann said, “is don’t do anything stupid in the beginning of the game.”

Eventually, though, the anxiety dissipates. “After three or four times of getting up off your butt, you forget about the nervousness,” said former Dolphins All-Pro guard Bob Kuechenberg, who was on five Super Bowl teams and played in four. “Then you go back to doing what you’re trained to do.”

Some teams employ sports psychologists to help numb players’ nerves before big games. “It can devastate a team if the proper approach is not taken,” said Palm Beach-based John F. Murray, whom Tennis Magazine called the Roger Federer of sports psychologists. “The media attention and the hoopla needs extreme management.”

Bratton said he cracked jokes before championship games and spewed wisecracks in the huddle to ease the tension: “That’s how I survived it.”

Murray, who has counseled tennis’ Vince Spadea and others before big matches, said he suggests players competing in championship games go “through daily imagery sessions where they get so comfortable with this game that by the time it begins it’s been dealt with many times before, and the players could focus on what they do best.”

Players point to other potential speed bumps in preparing for a Super Bowl. Former Dolphin Nat Moore said he panicked two days before the Dolphins-Redskins Super Bowl in January 1983 because he felt he wasn’t mentally prepared.

“You have more requests, more demands on your time than ever before because your friends and family are traveling with you,” he said. “You’ve gotten caught up in the fanfare. On Friday night, you try to hone in on the game plan and realize you’re well behind.

“I pride myself on being well-prepared and there is a panic that sets in. That happened to me the first year, and the second time in 1986, I didn’t get caught up in the fanfare and media blitz.”

Theismann noted that in the lobby before a Super Bowl, “guys will say, `I’ll give you $1,000 if I can have three minutes of your time.’ The biggest thing as a player is, don’t look at it as an opportunity to capitalize on everything because then you lose focus on the game. Then it becomes an absolute nightmare.”

CBS analyst Steve Tasker, who was 0-4 in Super Bowls as a Buffalo Bill, said distractions can take a toll. Before the 1991 game in Tampa, the Bills stayed in a hotel where their fans partied all night before the game.

“It kept some guys awake,” Tasker said. “Coach Marv Levy was concerned, and GM Bill Polian was really upset.”

CBS analyst and former Cincinnati quarterback Boomer Esiason spoke last week of the problems created by the Overtown riots before the 1989 game at Dolphin Stadium.

“We left the Omni,” he said. “Overtown was on fire at that time. They took us to a `secret’ hotel that 5,000 fans were waiting for us at. So there goes the secret out the window.”

Then there’s the challenge of juggling ticket requests. “Besides having to play in the game, you’ve got everyone you ever knew who wants a ticket,” said former Dallas Cowboys star Thomas “Hollywood” Henderson, who played in three Super Bowls. “In a sense, it’s a bit of a curse being part of this game.”

Henderson said people not only ask for tickets, but also, “Oh by the way, can you get me a plane ticket, too, a car, spending money?”

Said Henderson: “This thing becomes crazy as hell. It would be nice to have some psychologist or psychiatrist to take that off their head, like Dr. Phil.”

Tasker said after the first Super Bowl loss, the Bills hired a travel agency and became more involved in ticket distribution to create more time for players “to study film.” Not that it particularly helped – Buffalo never broke through with a win .

Another adjustment is the two-week wait before the game. “That makes it worse,” Henderson said. “Once they go into lock down, someone should come in and do a lecture and a prayer.”

Said Tasker: “You’re climbing the wall for the game to start.”

It’s worse for college players, for whom the wait before the championship game can be as long as six weeks. “It’s very difficult to stay focused,” Bratton said. “You get so antsy and tired of practices against each other. You’ve got to do different things with the team, like trips to the movies.”

Two quandaries for coaches are how many new elements to introduce into the game plan and whether to spend more time preparing their teams than they usually do.

“Some tweaks are good, but not major changes,” Theismann said. “You can’t put in 30 new plays. You don’t have enough practice time.”

“You can overprepare,” Bratton said. Before Denver’s 1990 Super Bowl loss to San Francisco, Broncos coach Dan Reeves was “so nervous, he brought in all the plays from training camp that we hadn’t run in a while,” Bratton remembered. “That was a bad move. We lost. We were confused.”

Reeves, who was 0-4 in Super Bowls as a head coach (three with Denver, one with Atlanta), said he tried different approaches but never found a winning formula. Sometimes he gave the players the game plan two weeks in advance. Then he tried doing it the week of the game so it mirrored the regular season.

Sometimes he allowed players to stay with their families the week before the game. Another time, he moved the players to a different hotel to keep them more isolated.

“I tried it both ways and it didn’t work,” Reeves said. “You have to do what you think is right.”

But in general, he still believes, “You have to try to stay as much with what the players are used to.”

Former Dolphins coach Don Shula agrees. Shula, who coached in five Super Bowls and won two, said, “Your basic philosophy is you want to do what got you there. If there are things you can add and do differently, you do it. You certainly learn from all your experiences.”

For some, the pain of losing a championship game exceeds the joy of winning one. “I would rather have not played in the game than played in them and lost,” former Dolphins linebacker Kim Bokamper said of his 1993 Super Bowl appearance. “Losing is so much harder to take.”

Theismann agreed: “Losing sticks with you longer. I can go over plays in the 1984 Oakland game more than I can tell you plays in the one I won the year before vs. Miami. The one you lose, you go over and say, `I could have done this different, or if only I had looked the safety off. …”"

When particular plays in championship games become etched in the minds of fans, the players involved often hear about it whenever they’re in public. Bokamper is frequently reminded about the 1983 Super Bowl play in which Theismann knocked a potential interception from his hands.

“Had I just dropped the ball and nobody made a move on me, it would bother me a lot more than it has over the years,” Bokamper said. “People ask all the time. It doesn’t grate on me.”

Meanwhile, former University of Miami receiver Lamar Thomas estimates “thousands” of fans have reminded him over the years about the 1990 Sugar Bowl play in which Alabama cornerback George Teague raced downfield and stripped the ball from him to preserve a 27-13 Crimson Tide lead. If that hadn’t happened, Miami would have scored a touchdown on the play and declined a holding penalty against Alabama.

A stranger recently asked Thomas about the play in a Winn-Dixie in Miami. “Man, I lost a lot of money” on that game, the man told Thomas.

“You probably lost $100,” Thomas responded. “It doesn’t compare to what I lost that night.”

Thomas said he has seen the play five times over the years, but he now turns away when it’s replayed. “It’s a sore subject for me,” he said. “I gave people an opportunity to take all my perfection away and focus on that one play. If you take that play away, Lamar Thomas goes down as the greatest.

“When people try to bring it up in bars or embarrass me, I tell them, `That was my third national championship game. You can’t win them all. That was one of the greatest plays in college football history. At least I’ll be remembered for something. When I walk out this door, I won’t remember you.”"

When Thomas and Teague were reunited as Dolphins teammates in 1997, “I told Teague in practice he would never catch me again,” Thomas said. “He said, `Anytime you want to drive my car, you can, because without you I wouldn’t have it.’ We became good friends.”

Though Thomas still has wistful feelings about that day – largely because the Hurricanes lost – former Dolphins kicker Garo Yepremian can laugh about his notorious Super Bowl gaffe because it came in a win to cap Miami’s perfect season.

In the 14-7 Super Bowl victory against Washington in January 1973, Yepremian’s field-goal attempt was blocked, and he fumbled attempting to pass.

The Redskins’ Mike Bass picked it up and ran 49 yards for a touchdown.

“Even though that pass was the worst thing at the time, it was the best thing that ever happened to me,” Yepremian said several years ago. “I can laugh about it. Fans can laugh about it. But a lot of people don’t realize I was the kicker of the decade.”

Dr. John F. Murray is a sports psychologist and clinical psychologist providing sports psychology and counseling services based in Palm Beach, Florida.

MPI FORECAST FEATURED IN INDIANPOLIS STAR
icon1 admin | icon2 News & Events | icon4 01 28th, 2007| icon3Comments Off

Indianapolis Star – Jan 28, 2007 – Phillip Wilson – AND ANOTHER FIELD: Dr. John F. Murray, a licensed clinical and sport performance psychologist, sent an email in which he compares the Colts and Bears on a mental performance index, his invention to measure the degree to which a team plays to perfection. Dr. Murray writes, so far, the Colts have scored .547 on his MPI compared to the Bears .520. He favors the Colts on offense, .548 to .510. He also gave the Colts the edge in defense (.536 to .515), special teams (.560 to .558), total pressure (.570 to .507), pressure offense (.458 to .394), pressure defense (.673 to .621) and total pressure (.570 to .507).

He says that .600 would be considered an exceptional score and calls the Colts overall .548 ery impressive. The 45-year-old doctor with a PhD from Palm Beach, Fla., writes, Taken together, it appears that Chicago is outmatched in this game. The Bears will have to play an almost perfect game, win the battle of turnovers, and make huge big plays to win this one. Indianapolis has so decisively outperformed Chicago that a two- or three-touchdown victory looks imminent. Im sure Bears fans scoff at this as psycho babble. In fairness to the doc, the MPI correctly predicted Tampa Bays blowout of Oakland four years ago as well as “close games the next two years. So his MPI beat the spread the first three years. But take heart, Bears fans, he didnt beat the spread in last year Super Bowl.

Dr. John F. Murray is a sports psychologist and clinical psychologist providing sports psychology and counseling services based in Palm Beach, Florida.

COLTS VICTORY AUCTIONED ON E-BAY
icon1 admin | icon2 News & Events | icon4 01 28th, 2007| icon3Comments Off

Jan 28, 2007 – For Immediate Release

Indianapolis Colts Victory in Super Bowl XLI Auctioned on e-Bay

Miami, FL — January 28, 2007 — Sport psychologist Dr. John F. Murray’s (http://www.JohnFMurray.com) Mental Performance Index (MPI) data indicates that the Indianapolis Colts are a far superior team to the Chicago Bears entering the 2007 Super Bowl XLI. As such, Murray has begun an acution on e-Bay to offer for bidding a Colts victory document for Super Bowl XLI. The winner of the auction will be provided a one page report showing precisely why the Colts were a stronger team and superior to the Bears on all seven categories of the MPI.

The bidding for this document is intended to contribute to the excitement of the Super Bowl and the awareness of mental skills in sports. Should the Colts not win this game for any reason, the auction winner will be provided a 100% refund. “This is all in serious fun, based on a serious system which has been used to analyze every play in the NFL playoffs,” says Dr. Murray. “Scoring includes mental factors such as pressure management, execution, and reduction of careless errors.”

While the Mental Performance Index (MPI) is a serious system that involves Dr. Murray’s review of every play in the playoffs, Dr. Murray never claims that he can predict the outcome of any game in sports, and he does not endorse any kind of gambling or betting on football or other sports. His mission is to show how important mental factors are in sports, and in this case football, as he believes coaches and fans often mistakingly downgrade the importance of mental training, mental factors, and counseling in enhancing performance and well being in sports. “The MPI’s accuracy is its best testimony” says Dr. Murray.

Dr. Murray is available for interviews and more information can be found at http://www.JohnFMurray.com. Bidding starts at $1 and the auction begins on Sunday January 28 at 11:30 EST and ends at the same time on Super Bowl Sunday.

John F. Murray, PhD
340 Royal Poinciana Way Suite 339J
Palm Beach, Florida 33480
Tel: 561-596-9898
Fax: 561-805-8662
http://www.JohnFMurray.com

Dr. John F. Murray is a sports psychologist and clinical psychologist providing sports psychology and counseling services based in Palm Beach, Florida.

TRACK RECORD OF THE MPI
icon1 admin | icon2 News & Events | icon4 01 27th, 2007| icon3Comments Off

Jan 27, 2007 – Mental Performance Index

The Mental Performance Index or “MPI” is the first ever measure of mental performance used in sport (in this case American Football).

The index was developed by Dr. John F. Murray, a licensed clinical and sport performance psychologist in 2002 to demonstrate the importance of mental factors in football such as “pressure management,” “focused execution,” and “reduction of mental errors.” In the first three major public tests of the accuracy of the MPI on radio and television stations worldwide, the MPI almost perfectly estimated the ultimate performance of the teams in the Super Bowl (Super Bowl XXXVII 2003, Super Bowl XXXVIII 2004, and Super Bowl XXXIX 2005), beating the spread each time, going counter to public opinion, and correctly estimating the ultimate course of the games. In 2003 the Oakland Raiders were favored to win by 9 over the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. The MPI showed that Tampa Bay, by contrast, was much better. In 2004 and 2005, the MPI analysis showed the teams to be relatively equal and forecasted a very close contest even though the New England Patriots were predicted to win by at least 7 points in each game. The 2004 game was tied with 4 seconds remaining (3 point New England win) and the 2005 game was the first game in Super Bowl history to be tied entering the final quarter of play. New England won by 3. In 2006 (Super Bowl XL), the MPI accurately forecast that Seattle would perform better on offense and defense and worse on special teams than the Pittsburgh Steelers. The MPI forecast that Seattle would perform better was correct, but for the first time in Super Bowl history, the lower performing team on the MPI won the game. At least 20 newspapers wrote about the success of the MPI before the game, and ABC TV in West Palm Beach interviewed Dr. Murray from his Palm Beach office about the system. Bloomberg Radio has interviewed Dr. Murray about the Super Bowl four years in a row. Seattle Coach Mike Holmgrem stated after the game that his team had to face two opponents, the Steelers and the officials. It was an extremely rare game filled with mistakes, and a few huge plays (a flea flicker, long pass, and record breaking 75 yard run from scrimmage) accounted for all of Pittsburgh’s points. Seattle missed countless opportunities to put the game away despite performing better. The MPI forecast against the spread fell to 3-1. The MPI will continue to be used each year to forecast the performance of the teams entering the Super Bowl.

Dr. John F. Murray is a sports psychologist and clinical psychologist providing sports psychology and counseling services based in Palm Beach, Florida.

Jan 25, 2007 – FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Football Shrink: ‘Colts Far Superior to Bears’

Dr. John F. Murray, a licensed clinical and sport performance psychologist (aka the “Football Shrink,” and the “Freud of Football” by the Washington Post) provides data to show that the Indianapolis Colts have performed much better than the Chicago Bears in the NFL playoffs. An analysis of the data indicates that a huge day is likely for the Colts on Super Bowl Sunday.

Mental Performance Index (MPI) of Sport Psychologist Forecasts a Super Bowl XLI Victory by the Indianapolis Colts Based on MPI Statistics.

MIAMI, FLORIDA (PRWEB) January 26, 2007 — This time the odds makers have the right team, butrnthey did not go nearly far enough. The Colts should soundly defeat the Chicago Bears in Super Bowl XLI. So predicts the creator of the Mental Performance Index(TM) (MPI(TM)), Dr. John F. Murray, who works with NFL players and has used the index throughout the last five NFL seasons to quantify the degree to which a team performs to perfection.

But to a sport psychologist, no team ever reaches perfection. The complimentary Super Bowl numerology by “The Football Shrink,” is posted on his website: http://www.JohnFMurray.com. Indianapolis (.547) scored much better than Chicago (.520) on the total MPI score throughout the playoffs, and higher than the Bears in all other six categories.

The Colts were superb on offense, where they posted a .548 to .510 advantage over the Bears.
They also held the advantage on defense (.536 to .515), special teams (.560rnto .558), total pressure (.570 to .507), pressure offense (.458 to .394), pressure defense (.673 to .621) and total pressure (.570 torn.507).

Taken together, it appears that Chicago is outmatched in this game. The Bears will have to play an almost perfect game, win the battle of turnovers, and make a few huge plays to win this one. Indianapolis has so decisively outperformed Chicago that a two or three touchdown victory looks imminent.

The 45-year-old PhD. licensed sport/performance psychologist in Palm Beach assigns points on each play throughout the playoffs for “focused execution,” “pressure management,” and “reduction of mental errors,” and game totals range from .000 to 1.000 (perfection).

“Scoring at .600 is excellent,” said Murray. “But to a sport psychologist, no team ever reaches perfection.” The Colts’ .547 average throughout the playoffs is very impressive.

As NFL coach Herman Edwards once said, “On every play somebody screws up.” Many good football coaches encourage their teams to place their focus on one play at a time. The MPI measures how well a team does this. Its power comes from the number of plays in a game (approximately 150) and the inclusion of mental factors in the scoring.

The MPI accurately forecast the blowout upset win by Tampa Bay over Oakland four years ago (in Arizona Republic), and forecast “extremely close games” the next two years, beating the official spread each of the first 3 years it was used. Last year, the MPI accurately forecast that Seattle would perform better on offense and defense and worse on special teams than the Pittsburgh Steelers. The MPI forecast that Seattle would perform better was correct, but for the first time in Super Bowl history, the lower performing team on the MPI won the game.

The MPI has been featured by ESPN The Magazine (December, 2002) and Murray has appeared on hundreds of radio and television stations to discuss the MPI and sport psychology. Last year, Dr. Murray discussed the MPI on ESPN Canada, ABC television in West Palm Beach and CBS television in Sacramento. Previous appearances include Westwood One national radio, ESPN Radio affiliates (e.g., Dallas, TX and Blacksburg, VA), Ron Jacober’s award winning “Sports on Sunday Morning” on KMOX in St. Louis, Mo., numerous radio programs in Canada, and Bloomberg Radio. He will again make multiple media appearances leading up to the game.

Murray provides lectures, mental coaching, and sport psychology services to athletes and teams in many sports. He has helped NFL players. He authored “Smart Tennis: How to Play and Win the Mental Game,” endorsedrnby Lindsay Davenport, and Vincent Spadea credited Murray for helping him overcome the longest losing streak in tennis history. Dr. Murray just returned from the Australian Open where he was the official coach of Vincent Spadea who got his first win in eight years of this tournament.

Dr. Murray is available for interviews.

John F. Murray, PhD
Licensed Sport Psychologist
340 Royal Poinciana Way Suite 339J
Palm Beach, FL 33480
Telephone: 561-596-9898
Web: http://www.JohnFMurray.com

Dr. John F. Murray is a sports psychologist and clinical psychologist providing sports psychology and counseling services based in Palm Beach, Florida.

JOHN F MURRAY’S THIRD BLOG FROM DOWN UNDER
icon1 admin | icon2 News & Events | icon4 01 19th, 2007| icon3Comments Off

Jan 19, 2007 – Hello from the Australian Open,

I haven’t heard from several of you yet, so please let me know you are getting these and how you are doing!

See the recent USA Today article posted at the top of my site at http://www.JohnFMurray.com in which Vince and I talk with Douglas Robson about the psychology of the James Blake vs. Carlos Moya match-up in which they must play each other twice in a row.

As for Vince, good news and bad news. The good news is that he won his first round doubles match – paired with Jan Hernych – in three sets. It was a gritty and impressive win. He also won his first round singles match over Igor Andreev, the first win he has had at the Australian Open in 8 years!! FYI: Andreev beat Vince in 2004, the only other time they played during Vince’s best season on tour, and Andreev
beat Andy Roddick last year at the Indian Wells Masters Series. This was a breakthrough for Vince.

The bad news is that he fell ill before his second round singles match and still almost beat one of the top seeds, Dominik Hrbaty, on 50% energy. He won the first set and was up in both the second and third sets before running out of steam on one of the hottest days recorded in Australian Open history. While there are never any excuses for losing, you are now one of the few people in the world who now know
that Vince came down with a virus a couple days ago, and his performance showed it. He appeared very exhausted midway through the match, and this is not like Vince who has worked to get in the best physical shape of his career. Hrbaty is known as a machine who can run forever, so it was a bad match-up as Vince’s shot making
skills were not enough against this top player while he was sick and in tennis desert warfare.

Next up in doubles is the #1 team in the world, the Bryan Brothers, and this match will take place Sunday. Following Vince’s last loss – or Aussie Open doubles championship, whichever comes first – I go back to Florida and resume a normal life and sport psychology practice. I’ll walk away with at least two Australian Open coaching wins and at least six ATP Tour wins (including the two singles wins on the trip to Nashville last year) in one heck of an interesting experience filling
in as a coach.

The next big news will be the NFL Playoffs and my annual performance ratings based on analyzing every play in the playoffs using the MPI or Mental Performance Index. I’ve been reviewing games at nights here in Australia … so for the 5th year in a row you’ll see how each team has performed leading up to the big game, including for the not to be neglected mental performance! Stay tuned for this. It should be exciting having the Super Bowl in Miami this year.

Enough from me … now let me here how you are doing!

John F Murray
http://www.JohnFMurray.com
561-596-9898

Dr. John F. Murray is a sports psychologist and clinical psychologist providing sports psychology and counseling services based in Palm Beach, Florida.

USA TODAY FROM AUSSIE OPEN
icon1 admin | icon2 News & Events | icon4 01 16th, 2007| icon3Comments Off

USA TODAY – Jan 16, 2007 – Douglas Robson – SPORTS; Pg. 10C – Foes meet again in matter of days; Blake, Moya play rare first round after final match -

MELBOURNE, Australia — Even before James Blake defended his title at Sydney on Saturday by defeating Carlos Moya 6-3, 5-7, 6-1, he knew it was a dress rehearsal for a bigger match today.

That’s because, in a strange turn of events, the fifth-ranked Blake drew Moya as a first-round opponent at the Australian Open, creating a rare back-to-back scenario.

“It’s a funny, awkward situation,” Blake says. “Never happened before.”

Moya even joked during the post-match trophy presentation about the odd circumstance.

“I’ll tell you a secret,” the 1998 French Open champ from Spain said. “James and I spoke before the match, and we decided he would win here and I would win in Melbourne.”

Baseball has regular three-game series. Hockey and basketball teams can face off up to seven consecutive times in the playoffs. In tennis, the chance of meeting in successive matches is far smaller, especially among top players. Moya, a former No.1, struggled last season and is ranked No.41.

“I played a guy first round two weeks in a row, but I don’t think I’ve ever played someone in a final and then first round,” said sixth-seeded Andy Roddick, one of six American men to advance to the second round here Monday.

Neither tour tracks the frequency of successive matches, but none have occurred heading into Grand Slam events during the last 10 years, according to the International Tennis Federation, which oversees the four majors.

Still, it’s not unheard of.

Veteran Vince Spadea recalls beating Ota Fukarek of the Czech Republic to win a lower-tier Challenger event at North Miami Beach, Fla., in 2002. He then drove to nearby Key Biscayne the next day and played Fukarek again in qualifying for the Nasdaq-100.

“I didn’t even get a day off,” says Spadea, who beat Fukarek a second time but suffered heatstroke. “I was sick to death. Luckily all I had to do was drive up to Key Biscayne.”

Though uncommon, players say dealing with an opponent in back-to-back matches can be tricky tactically, emotionally and psychologically.

One player can ride the confidence of a win, while the loser can approach the rematch with less pressure.

“I think it’s a hard thing to win decisively and to stay on top,” says Spadea, 32, a winner Monday in straight sets vs. Igor Andreev of Russia. “He’s going to look for his second chance.

“It’s like his New Year’s. They have revenge.”

Top-ranked Roger Federer, who kicked off his title defense Monday by beating German Bjorn Phau, says “it’s more mental than anything else.”

“You regroup if you lost, and if you win, you try to keep the pressure on the opponent.”

The No.1 Swiss says he’d much rather be riding a wave of self-confidence from a win than searching for a way to turn the tables.

John Murray, a Florida-based sports psychologist working and traveling with Spadea, says the two situations nearly cancel each other out.

“The guy who’s lost has a huge advantage because he has nothing to lose,” Murray says. “But the confidence is with the player that won, so it almost evens it out.”

Murray’s advice for both parties is to avoid focusing on the outcome and concentrate on one specific aspect to improve.

“If you stay status quo, you’re at a disadvantage,” he says.

Some players agree that while blocking out the last match is important to maintain clarity of purpose, a radical shift in strategy is unlikely and perhaps unwise.

“I really find it hard to believe that James and Carlos found something out in Sydney on Saturday night that they didn’t know about each other from the six previous meetings,” Roddick says. “I would tend to think that going into the first round here they might have had a similar game plan, even since they played in Sydney.”

Dr. John F. Murray is a sports psychologist and clinical psychologist providing sports psychology and counseling services based in Palm Beach, Florida.

STAINED
icon1 admin | icon2 News & Events | icon4 01 7th, 2007| icon3Comments Off

The State – Jan 7, 2007 – Kent Babb – One mistake is all it took to send Tony McDaniel’s life and football career into a tailspin. Now the former Keenan High standout is seeking forgiveness, and a way to silence the whispers ruining his life – JACKSONVILLE, Fla.- Tony McDaniel closes his eyes and opens his ears. His headphones are on, and the rap CD is blaring.

He cannot hear the whispers.

McDaniel, a reserve defensive tackle for the Jacksonville Jaguars, takes 20 minutes before each game to prepare his mind for competition. Sometimes, he visualizes running through the Alltel Stadium tunnel and onto the field. Other times, he imagines an offensive guard underestimating McDaniel’s speed, trying to compensate … and making a mistake. It clears the way for the 6-foot-7, 295-pound Columbia resident to do what he does best: Get the quarterback and pound him into the turf.

McDaniel’s pregame routine is a time he has come to love, and depend on, for emotional balance.

“Your body feels warm, and you feel real excited, like you want to jump around or something,” he says. “Your body feels all loose. That’s how I know when I’m ready. I start sweating. I sweat real easy. I know I’m really loose then. It’s a great feeling. It’s like some type of high or something.”

When McDaniel is here, there are few interruptions. When the headphones come off, anything can happen and the same things will be said, the same words – thug, criminal, dangerous – used to describe him.

McDaniel is known less for his football career and more for a mistake in January 2005 that nearly cost him everything. McDaniel lost his temper during a pickup basketball game at the University of Tennessee and delivered a devastating punch to a student nearly half his size, breaking four bones in the man’s face. The victim, DeShaun Goodrich, was knocked unconscious; the injury required facial surgery, and parts of Goodrich’s face remain numb.

McDaniel was suspended the first two games of the 2005 season, and Goodrich’s $800,000 lawsuit forced McDaniel to enter the ‘06 NFL Draft – despite starting just one game in three seasons at Tennessee.

McDaniel has spent the past two years trying to overcome his mistake. And it is one that has compelled bystanders to talk and solidify McDaniel’s bad reputation. When the whispers get too loud, McDaniel turns up the volume on his CD player and tries to squeeze back into his comfort zone.

He does not understand why one mistake – one he has apologized for, both in person and in a handwritten letter to Goodrich – earned him such a reputation. It is a flaw that caused NFL teams to pass on McDaniel because the stain of violence was too deep to ignore.

Worse, McDaniel does not understand why, after spending the first 19 years of his life avoiding trouble, he allowed himself to lose control.

Then again, he has spent most of his life as a football player. McDaniel learned at Keenan High and at Tennessee that the best defensive linemen ignore thought and method and instead surrender their bodies to impulse. Don’t think, coaches told him. Let your body act on its own.

He did. And McDaniel, who has spent his life creating collisions and violence and harnessing their side effects, allowed his body to act before his mind could stop it. And because it spilled over outside the arena, he continues to pay.

When the headphones are on, McDaniel tells himself what few others will: He is not the violent man his reputation would suggest.

Before we can understand McDaniel, perhaps we should examine his environment. Before thoughts became whispers and whispers became jabs, communication came in the form of men in uniform barking orders at other men in uniform.

The coach-player relationship, at least during their time together on a team, is one-dimensional. A coach’s job description is to disregard feelings and tell players what to do. The players are foot soldiers; if they question orders or, worse, disobey them, there will be consequences.

Coaches understand their positions, but some admit it is difficult to stay in character. They offset the unusual dynamic by blending their at-home families with their football families. In the case of Tennessee defensive line coach Dan Brooks, he often invites Volunteers linemen to his home for meals. It is a way to both encourage communication and bond players and coaches off the field.

Brooks admits the invitations also are designed to fill “dead hours” in between practices, classes and meetings – time players might otherwise spend in front of televisions, wandering around campus or staggering into troublesome situations.

It was during a dead time that McDaniel found his way into trouble on Jan. 12, 2005. Several days after Tennessee’s 38-7 win against Texas A&M at the Cotton Bowl, players returned to campus several days before classes began. McDaniel had little to do, so he agreed to play basketball with teammates at the Tennessee Recreational (T-Rec) Complex around 6 p.m. DeShaun Goodrich, who played pickup games often, joined the game.

About 90 minutes later, several of McDaniel’s football teammates watched as the 297-pounder drove toward the basket, lost his footing and fell to the hardwood. He got up and saw Goodrich’s face first.

“He acted like he tried to do it,” McDaniel says, referring to his theory that Goodrich tripped him. “I jumped up, and I seen he was still there. The first thing that came into my head was hit – hit him.”

The next day, McDaniel told Brooks what had happened. McDaniel was hopeful, but Brooks was devastated. The 30-year coaching veteran had seen it before: A player makes a mistake, and coaches must make an example of him and, indirectly, put his future in doubt. It is something they never could do to their own families, and it underscores what the player-coach dynamic is at its core. It also was a decision that remains a sore subject for Brooks.

“They’re not a number. I grew up on a farm; they’re not brutes,” Brooks says. “They’re young men, and they come here (to college) very much as adolescents. As much as they don’t like to admit that, you realize that it’s a fact of life. In order to have sanity as a parent or a coach, you have to be able to deal with different things. Life goes on. You have to be able to put it in perspective and realize that none of us is perfect.”

So, what went on inside McDaniel’s mind during the split second after his body hit the hardwood and before his fist connected with Goodrich’s face? If it was not, as McDaniel maintains, deeply rooted anger and the manifestation of a violent temperament, what was it?

Could it have been football?

Dr. John Murray, a sports psychologist based in Palm Beach, Fla., said McDaniel’s moment of misbehavior was similar, physiologically speaking, to what happens when a player reacts to a snapped football.

One thing triggers the behavior – in this case the foul McDaniel sustained – and the brain, having been trained to react to similar triggers, reacts. Murray said that, particularly among defensive players, who often are graded on a quick first step and their instincts, learning to leave violence between the sidelines is an underrated challenge.

“Violence and aggression are taught from Day 1,” Murray says. “You’ve got to want to punish your opponent. How you turn it off is the big question.

“I don’t think we should be surprised at this.”

Murray said McDaniel’s football training has taught his brain to ignore inhibition as it pertains to explosive reactions. Defensive linemen have less than five seconds to get to the quarterback before he releases the ball; there is little time to think about a succession of actions. Instead, the best linemen react, deliver a blow and ignore potential consequences.

Ask McDaniel about the feeling that came over him before he punched Goodrich. It was similar, he said without prompt of Murray’s theory, to delivering the perfect tackle. But unlike a clean hit during a football game, the punch had devastating penalties.

“As soon as I hit him,” McDaniel says, “I was like, ‘Man …’ After that, everybody was like, ‘You should leave, you should leave.’ Everybody made me leave and go home. That’s all I remember.”

Former NBA player Kermit Washington has dealt with the same consequences in the 29 years since he delivered his own devastating punch to an opponent during a game.

Washington swung at Houston Rockets forward Rudy Tomjanovich and caught him by surprise; the blow fractured Tomjanovich’s jaw and skull. Doctors said the injuries were life threatening.

Tomjanovich, who went on to become a successful NBA coach, recovered. Washington, however, continues to deal with the lingering effects of his mistake.

“All of a sudden, I was ostracized, and I can understand that,” Washington told USA Today in 2002. “People hated me, which I understood. They really hated me. You could sense that. Their eyes were looking at you like, ‘I’d like to kill you.’

“But I understood that. I dealt myself a certain hand. I had to live with that hand. I couldn’t turn it in.”

Washington, whose NBA career declined after the incident, has been unsuccessful in business and in pursuing a coaching position. No general managers or athletics directors seem willing to take a chance on Washington and incite a PR backlash. Aside from one season as an assistant coach in the NBA’s developmental league, Washington’s ambition has been overshadowed by his punch, which was the subject of a 2002 book.

The State left messages with a spokesman for Washington, who now runs a charity organization, requesting that he explain how McDaniel might learn from his mistakes. Perhaps he could advise McDaniel how to begin scrubbing the stain that already has slammed doors in McDaniel’s face – the same doors Washington has been trying to break through for nearly 30 years.

Washington did not return the calls. Perhaps 29 years of whispers has crushed him. Perhaps they were enough to have Washington close his ears and seal his lips on the subject once and for all.

Take a look. Everyone else has. A surveillance video at Tennessee’s T-Rec Building recorded Tony McDaniel’s pickup basketball game on that January night and turned it into a marquee attraction.

In the months after the incident, the video reached the Internet and was posted on message boards as both a disturbing piece of visual evidence and an even more disagreeable piece of grotesque humor.

The video did two things: It gave Goodrich a solid piece of evidence for his lawsuit, and it allowed McDaniel to prove what really happened.

“A lot of people ask me, like, don’t I wish there wasn’t a tape?” McDaniel says. “In a way, I’m kind of glad there was a tape. When they (lawyers) were telling it, they made it seem like I was a monster, and I just go around hitting people for no reason.

“I’m the biggest, strongest, most athletic guy on the court. There was a lot of trash talking, a lot of fouling, like, personal fouling against me. What I wish I would’ve done was stop playing. Then, on the tape, right before that play – it even shows on the tape where I start talking loud and saying, ‘The next person (who) fouls me, I am going to hit him.’ Then, they gave me the ball right back. Like, daring me, almost.”

What follows is a blur of grainy footage and a cluster of bodies. McDaniel took the ball at the right wing and dribbled four times before charging past a defender and toward the basket. Before he could attempt a layup, McDaniel tripped and fell; he sprang to his feet, saw Goodrich and delivered a hard punch with his right hand that sent Goodrich sprawling to the hardwood.

The other players – most of whom were McDaniel’s football teammates – scattered within seconds. McDaniel stood over the fallen Goodrich for a moment and walked in one direction before turning to walk a different way.

A police report stated Goodrich lay unconscious for several seconds but was awake when an ambulance arrived. A friend drove him to a hospital where X-rays revealed four broken bones in his face.

The subject of the surveillance video began a series of ripples through the lives of Goodrich and McDaniel, who was charged with felony aggravated assault. McDaniel later pleaded guilty to misdemeanor assault and was sentenced to supervised probation.

“I know for sure, if he could take that punch back – not now but when he first did it – he would take it back and then some,” says Walter McDaniel, the football player’s father. “I can hear it in his voice.”

Goodrich sued McDaniel last January, asking for $800,000 in restitution. The suit, which is pending, could be the latest in a long list of checks McDaniel’s family has written on behalf of Tony during the past two years.

Walter McDaniel, who is one of 21 children, asked family members to contribute what they could to help offset his son’s legal fees. Walter contributed his entire $5,000 tax refund, and he plans to give this year’s refund to the fund.

The most difficult thing for the family, however, has been the talk that McDaniel’s reputation is permanently soiled – and has no possibility of parole.

“You make mistakes. You pay for them,” Walter McDaniel says. “He continually has to pay for that mistake. He’s making something out of himself. They haven’t had anything else bad to say about him, so they keep saying this.”

In the NFL, image is not everything, but it accounts for plenty. The specter of a violent past is not something most general managers will ignore.

McDaniel announced last January that he would skip his senior season at Tennessee and enter the NFL Draft. It was the only way McDaniel knew to raise anywhere near the $800,000 Goodrich sought – even though family members and coaches pleaded with him to remain in school.

Last April, McDaniel and two friends, Jamal Hayes and Chris Lindsay, gathered at Walter McDaniel’s home and waited for McDaniel’s name to be called. Officials from several teams called McDaniel’s cell phone, telling him they planned to draft him in the late rounds.

When those teams’ picks came, McDaniel and his friends pointed cell-phone cameras toward the television and prepared to click the shutter when Tony’s name flashed on the screen. They waited for two days and seven rounds. They never got their photograph.

Jacksonville Jaguars player personnel director James Harris said last month that, considering McDaniel’s size and potential, the only plausible reason he was not drafted was because of the incident during the basketball game.

Hayes, who grew up with McDaniel in Hartsville, says that should not have been enough to overlook his friend.

“That one punch changed everything,” says Hayes, who plays receiver at USC. “Everybody we’re cool with, they’ve either got a criminal record, they’re in jail or dead. It’s one of those three. For Tony not to get his chance (in the draft) after all we’ve been through, that’s just a shame, man.”

Shortly after the draft, though, McDaniel’s phone rang. It rang again and again. Teams wanted him. About 10 NFL teams, McDaniel says, offered free-agent contracts. Less than an hour after the Oakland Raiders took Maine wideout Kevin McMahan with the final pick of the draft, McDaniel agreed to a free-agent deal with the Jaguars worth $275,000, the league minimum.

The previous two days had been exhausting. McDaniel and his friends left a relative’s home in Hartsville and went to the drag strip at Darlington International Speedway. The racecars’ loud motors were soothing to McDaniel’s restless mind. For the first time in days, he could not hear his cell phone. The whispers had no chance.

There is someone else who wants to speak, of course. Only, he does not know if he should – or what he should say.

He speaks in a timid voice, barely louder than a whisper.

“I don’t know if I should say anything,” he says. “You know, the case and all.”

It is DeShaun Goodrich, the man who suffered most from a hard right jab and the talk that came with it. Goodrich was a reserve basketball player at Columbia (Tenn.) State Community College before he transferred to Tennessee. It was at Columbia State that he learned to be a defensive specialist who played when coach Rod Connors needed a smart player with no fear – and one willing to sacrifice his body for the team.

It was Goodrich’s experience that attracted him to games with Tennessee football players, men larger and stronger than the 185-pound Goodrich. He wanted competition, and those games offered it.

Goodrich had enough, though, on the evening of Jan. 12, 2005. He was tired, and he wanted to go back to his apartment for a quick shower before heading to Thompson Arena to watch the Volunteers basketball team play Mississippi State. Goodrich looked at the clock and saw it was 7 p.m.; he had time for one more game.

Twenty-nine minutes later, Goodrich was on the floor with no one around him. His teammates had fled, and he had suffered fractures to his left orbital bone and jaw.

Goodrich admits the game was intense, but he denies fouling McDaniel. He says his face was the first target McDaniel saw.

“It really could’ve been anybody,” says Goodrich, who did not guard McDaniel. “I was just going for a rebound. That’s my side of the story. I didn’t think I made any contact.”

Goodrich, who needed surgery to have a metal plate inserted to hold his jaw in place, says he still feels numbness in his left cheek. But it was the mental agony that has hurt most; he says Tennessee fans ridiculed him after McDaniel was suspended. Goodrich says he still plays pickup basketball, but he first watches to gauge the game’s intensity. If there is too much trash talk and fouling, Goodrich cannot bring himself to play.

He already has constant reminders of what happened two years ago.

“Any time anything happens at UT, they always revert back to that,” Goodrich says. “I understand how the world is. But when you get asked about that, day after day, it wears on you. That’s really all I can say about it right now.”

Two years after McDaniel punched Goodrich, the reverberations of the incident remain. McDaniel’s career, which took an upturn when he signed with the Jaguars, remains unstable.

When the Jaguars lost to the Kansas City Chiefs this past week, Jacksonville was eliminated from playoff contention; that left McDaniel with an offseason to think about another training camp in which he must again prove himself. Such is life for free-agent signees – particularly those who register 16 tackles as a rookie and do not play in the team’s final seven games. McDaniel knows he is replaceable, and one mistake during the dead hours of the offseason could be enough to bury his career. He will return to Columbia, where he must avoid trouble at all costs.

Goodrich, now 28, admits he does not trust people as he once did. He works in retail sales and lives with his parents in Lewisburg, Tenn. Goodrich says he has considered dropping the lawsuit, but he thinks McDaniel’s punch has not elicited “any punishment at all” and plans to see the suit through.

McDaniel says he has tried to make peace, and he is confused why Goodrich does not acknowledge his apologies. Goodrich says he is “willing to talk to anybody,” but lawyers have encouraged him to keep quiet.

McDaniel says he wrote a letter to Goodrich this past year. He was sorry, McDaniel says he wrote, for all the trouble he caused Goodrich. After McDaniel put down the pen and sealed the envelope, he took a deep breath. He felt refreshed, as if a weight had been lifted off his shoulders.

“After I did it, I wished I could give him anything,” he says. “I wanted to be his friend after that; I wanted to show him that it wasn’t me. I felt good about doing it because I felt like I was doing something right, something that God wanted me to do.”

McDaniel maintains he is not a violent man. Goodrich even admits he does not believe McDaniel is a bad person; he simply made a mistake – but it is one he must pay for.

It is a mistake McDaniel might spend the rest of his life paying for. The stain he carries is deep and dark, and the whispers that follow make it difficult for McDaniel to live his life without the assistance of headphones.

“He has been good. That’s the thing I want to add to this,” Jaguars player personnel director Harris said. “He hasn’t had any problems here. He has come to work. He did a good job in the preseason; he made the team. He has been good since he has been here. He has represented the state of South Carolina well. We can just stop having the conversations about it. We can stop talking about it now. Let’s just judge him on how he goes forward. Then, we can all go forward.”

Dr. John F. Murray is a sports psychologist and clinical psychologist providing sports psychology and counseling services based in Palm Beach, Florida.